Mangol v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TREANOR, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company prosecuted this appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action brought to recover the face amount of an accident policy issued by the defendant company. There was a trial to the court without a jury upon an agreed statement of facts. The sole question on appeal relating to the merits of plaintiff’s claim is whether it falls within the following narrow exception to a general disclaimer of coverage i
“ * * * (excepting only septic infection of and through a visible wound caused directly and independently of all other…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Bryant v. Continental Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1916
- Higgins v. Midland Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1917
- Ziolkowski v. Continental Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Adele S. Duggan v. The Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
- Gravina v. Brunswick CorporationDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1972
- Rose Medical Center v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Lang v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940