Legal Opinion

Mangol v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 27, 1939No. 6754PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TREANOR, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company prosecuted this appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action brought to recover the face amount of an accident policy issued by the defendant company. There was a trial to the court without a jury upon an agreed statement of facts. The sole question on appeal relating to the merits of plaintiff’s claim is whether it falls within the following narrow exception to a general disclaimer of coverage i

“ * * * (excepting only septic infection of and through a visible wound caused directly and independently of all other…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Bryant v. Continental Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Higgins v. Midland Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Ziolkowski v. Continental Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adele S. Duggan v. The Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
  2. Gravina v. Brunswick CorporationDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1972
  3. Rose Medical Center v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Lang v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API