California Franchise Tax Board v. Wilshire Courtyard (In Re Wilshire Courtyard)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAPPAS, Bankruptcy Judge.
In this complicated dispute, the Panel is asked to review the opinions and orders of the bankruptcy court entered in a reopened chapter 11 3 real estate partnership reorganization case, and in particular, the state tax consequences of confirmation of the debtor’s plan for its former partners. While the substantive issues raised in this appeal involve interesting, complex questions about the interplay of bankruptcy and tax law, we may not comment on those issues. Instead, the Panel is compelled to reverse the bankruptcy court’s ruling that it had subject matter…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wilshire Courtyard v. California Franchise Tax BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Santander Consumer, USA, Inc. v. Houlik (In re Houlik)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Hasse v. Rainsdon (In Re Pringle)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Calvert ex rel. Meridian Investors Trust v. Zions Bancorporation (In re Consolidated Meridian Funds)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 2013
- Kirton v. Valley Health System (In Re Valley Health System)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.