Legal Opinion

Cumming v. Biossatt

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 15, 1847PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Rapides, King, J. cited Civil Code, arts. 33141, 3318.

1Opinion of the Court

The-judgment of the- court was pronounced by

Rost, J.

This is a third opposition,, in which three several mortgage creditors claim to-receive, by preference, the proceeds of the judicial sale of » slave..

In¡1835, Lewis Hoffman and Bis wife, believing themselves to be domiciliated in the parish; of Rapides, paying taxes and exercising their civil'and political rights in said parish, executed in favor of the Canal and Banking Company, apon- their homestead and a slave, a mortgage, which was duly recorded in the parish of their-supposed domicil. The priority of this mortgage in the parish of…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Booksh v. A. Wilbert Sons Lumber & Shingle Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  2. Comegys v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  3. Albritton v. ChildersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  4. State v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
  5. Commercial Bank v. MeauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API