Cumming v. Biossatt
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from the District Court of Rapides, King, J. cited Civil Code, arts. 33141, 3318.
1Opinion of the Court
The-judgment of the- court was pronounced by
Rost, J.
This is a third opposition,, in which three several mortgage creditors claim to-receive, by preference, the proceeds of the judicial sale of » slave..
In¡1835, Lewis Hoffman and Bis wife, believing themselves to be domiciliated in the parish; of Rapides, paying taxes and exercising their civil'and political rights in said parish, executed in favor of the Canal and Banking Company, apon- their homestead and a slave, a mortgage, which was duly recorded in the parish of their-supposed domicil. The priority of this mortgage in the parish of…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Booksh v. A. Wilbert Sons Lumber & Shingle Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
- Comegys v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
- Albritton v. ChildersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
- State v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
- Commercial Bank v. MeauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935