Roberts v. Ruh
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit' 'Court, Marshall County. Hen. J. H. McCoy, Judge, Action by J. E. Roberts against .Charles F. Ruh. Judgment for defendant, and from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtFueler, J.
At the trial of this action to recover a small.balance alleged to' be due plaintiff on account of" the sale and delivery of certain farm implements and repairs,'the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant on all the issues, and judgment was accordingly entered. While this appeal is from an order denying plaintiffs motion for a new trial, no assignment of error is predicated thereon, and the only question presented for consideration is the refusal of the court to direct a verdict in favor of plaintiff at the conclusion of all the evidence. While the ruling on the motion for a new…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Consolidated Land & Irrigation Co. v. HawleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
- Jones Lumber & Mercantile Co. v. FarisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- McKeever v. Homestake Mining Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
- Haugen v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
- Carroll v. NisbetSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Williamson v. Voedisch Jewelry Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- First National Bank v. WollmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929