Barnett v. Bailey's Beautician Supply Co.

— This is an appeal by the appellant who was plaintiff below from the Superior Court of Marion County Room 1. The issues were formed by the appellant’s second amended complaint and the appellee’s answers thereto under Rule 1-3, and the plaintiff-appellant’s reply thereto under Rule 1-3 to the affirmative paragraphs of answer.

In the first paragraph of her second amended complaint, the appellant alleged an implied warranty of a product known as Roux Oil Shampoo Tint and in the second paragraph, negligence of the defendant-appellee in failing to warn plaintiff-appellant that the use of the…