Simons Brick Co. v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Frank Karr, R. C. Gortner, W. R. Millar and Kenton A. Miller for Appellants. Albert Lee Stephens, City Attorney, Charles S. Burnell, Assistant City Attorney, and Wm. P. Mealey, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondent.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
Plaintiffs seek to enjoin the city of Los Angeles from removing a certain industrial spur-track maintained by the plaintiff railway company as a part of its electric railway system on Santa Monica Boulevard in the city of Los Angeles. This spur-track serves the manufacturing plant of the plaintiff brick company, which is situated on property adjacent to Santa Monica Boulevard. The trial court denied plaintiffs’ application for an injunction pendente lite, set aside a temporary restraining order which had been previously granted, sustained a demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- City Railway Co. v. Citizens' Street RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Helena Water Works Co. v. HelenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Sutro v. PettitCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Indianapolis Cable Street Railroad v. Citizens Street RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- City of Ashland v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Lynn v. DuckelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. AbarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Taylor v. SpearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Lynn v. DuckelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956