Hancock v. Kennedy
Court of Appeals of Georgia
ítule for contempt; .from Wilcox superior court—Judge Crum. June 18, 1917.
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.
1. Proceedings for contempt are of two classes, punitive and remedial. A proceeding of the former class is intended to punish the offender for a past act of omission or commission which has disturbed the regular proceedings of the court, interfered with its proper func-' tioning, resisted its authority, or reflected contempt upon it, and the authorized penalty in such a case is that prescribed by section 4849 (5) of the Civil Code of 1910; the latter or remedial proceeding is instituted to preserve and enforce the rights of private parties, and may be resorted to as a means of compelling…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tindall v. NisbetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Cobb v. BlackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1865
- Drakeford v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Ryan v. KingsberySupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carey Canada, Inc. v. HinelyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Grantham v. Universal Tax Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Crute v. CruteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Pullen v. ClecklerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Aiken v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.