Lungelow v. Diamond

The facts of this Dist./Mun. Cts. R.A.D.A. Rule 8A appeal by the defendant/appellant Rudy Diamond (Diamond), are similar to those found in our decision in Lance Tucker v. Rudy Diamond, 2010 Mass. App. Dec, ante, at 253. Indeed the three issues raised on appeal in this breach of contract action are identical to those raised in Tucker, supra. For the same reasons provided in Tucker, supra, we reject Diamond’s claims of error and affirm the entry of judgment.

According to the findings of fact made by the judge in a jury-waived trial, the plaintiff, Michael Lungelow (Lungelow), entered into a…