Legal Opinion

Rivera-Catellano v. Kinkela

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided June 28, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wright J-

This is a Dist/Mun. Cts. R A. D. A., Rule 8C, appeal of the entry of summary judgment for the defendant on the basis of the plaintiffs failure to satisfy the $2,000.00 tort threshold of G.L.c. 231, §6D. The sole issue presented for review is whether the cost of a G.L.c. 90, §34M independent medical examination (“IME”) of the plaintiff, ordered by an insurer to evaluate the plaintiffs Personal Injury Protection (TIP”) benefits claim, can be added to the total of the plaintiffs medical expenses for the purpose of arriving at the $2,000.00 statutory minimum.

The record indicates that on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cousineau v. LarameeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Victum v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Brito v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  4. Pietroforte v. Yellow Cab of Somerville, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  5. Perrault v. EspinalMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burgos v. Pilgrim InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010
  2. Lungelow v. DiamondMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010
  3. Tucker v. DiamondMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API