Legal Opinion

Colcord v. Banco de Tamaulipas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 5, 1920PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by Alan H. Colcord from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 5th day of June, 1918, vacating an attachment on motion of a junior attaching creditor.

1Opinion of the Court

Page, J.:

The majority of this court held that the amended complaint in this case as to the first and second causes of action was insufficient upon demurrer and gave the plaintiff leave to amend. (Colcord v. Banco de Tamaulipas, 181 App. Div. 295.) The plaintiff obtained an order for the defendant to show cause why he should not be allowed to serve a new warrant of attachment covering the additional causes of action set forth in the proposed second amended complaint. This motion was granted, the attorney for the defendant appearing and consenting in open court, and a new warrant of attachment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frost v. . MottNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  2. Van Camp v. . SearleNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. In re GriswoldNew York Supreme Court · 1851
  4. Jacobs v. . HoganNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  5. Colcord v. Banco De TamaulipasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Northwest Engineering Co. v. RapplNew York Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Taft v. DelsenerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1941
  3. American Merchant Marine Insurance v. Forsikrings-Aktieselskabet "Norden,"Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  4. Dexter & Carpenter, Inc. v. Lake & Export Coal Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API