Legal Opinion

Fry v. Kaessner

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1896No. 6492PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Ferguson, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

In tbis action Gustave Kaessner sought to recover damages in the sum of $20,000'alleged to have been suffered by him as the consequences of his malicious prosecution by Jonas Fry, the marshal of the village of Elk-horn, and a number of others, who were made defendants, but as to whom no more specific reference need be made, as, during the trial, a nonsuit of plaintiff’s cause of action was entered as to all of them. A trial of the issues was had, and the plaintiff in the district court was accorded a verdict and judgment against Jonas Fry in the sum of $350. Error proceedings have been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Diers v. MallonNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Zielke v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. KriskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hencke v. StandifordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  2. Ristine v. ClementsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Town of Gallup v. Gallup Cold Storage Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Hagelund v. MurphyNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Alexander v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API