Legal Opinion

Toth v. Vazquez

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 28, 1949PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Motions are made on behalf of the defendants John H. Coyne, executor of the estate of Peter Coyne, deceased, Samuel Galinsky, and Arthur A. Wolpin to strike out the alleged causes of action against them respectively in that such allegations are insufficient in law. Since the motions are accompanied by affidavits, the motions will be regarded as applications for summary judgments. Rule 3:12-2.

Unless the allegations of mutual mistake or unilateral mistake…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McCullough v. SullivanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1926
  2. Styles v. F. R. Long Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
  3. Sullivan v. StoutSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  4. Economy Building & Loan Ass'n v. West Jersey Title, &c., Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
  5. Jacobsen v. PetersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. St. Pius X House of Retreats v. CAMDEN DIOCESE NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Berman v. GurwiczNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  3. Pabon v. Hackensack Auto Sales, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  4. Silverstein v. Abco Vending ServiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  5. Ash v. FrazeeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API