Legal Opinion
Baca v. King
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 8, 1996No. 94-2237PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIVELY, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, the plaintiff seeks review, under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706 (1988), of a land exchange carried out by the Department of Interior’s Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Specifically, he claims that the exchange violated the equal value requirement of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA), 43 U.S.C. § 1716(b) (1988). For the following reasons, we affirm the order of the district court.
I
A
The plaintiff, Antonio J. Baca, maintains a cattle ranch in Santa Fe County, New Mexico. His ranch is made up of private…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bishop v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- W.R. Grace & Co. v. ChakarianCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc. v. Magnesium Elektron, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Robert D. Alexander v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Opala v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.