Legal Opinion

Buch v. Holliday

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 1990No. 58197PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from the entry of summary judgment against them in their suit against defendant William Holliday. The underlying action included other defendants and additional counts and as to them the action remains pending. The order granting the summary judgment was designated as final for purposes of appeal. Rule 74.01(b).

The parties have, unfortunately, dealt with this case, both here and in the trial court, with an absence of precision and an abundance of extraneous and tangential issues. Our review is limited to determining whether on the record before us there exist…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Daniel International Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  2. Hoene v. Associated Dry Goods CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  3. Haswell v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  4. Zahorsky v. Griffin, Dysart, Taylor, Penner & Lay, P.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority v. ZitkoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anne P. Hendry v. Francis J. Pelland and Sadur, Pelland & Rubinstein, P.C.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  2. Holley v. CaulfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API