Spirk v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court for Saline county. Tried beloAV before Hastings, J. References: Baltimore & O. R. Go. v. Bambrey, 16 Atl. Rep. [Pa.] 67; Head v. Georgia P. R. Go., 79 Ga. 359; Alabama G. B. R. Co. v. Heddleston, 3 So.
Read the full summary
Error from the district court for Saline county. Tried beloAV before Hastings, J. References: Baltimore & O. R. Go. v. Bambrey, 16 Atl. Rep. [Pa.] 67; Head v. Georgia P. R. Go., 79 Ga. 359; Alabama G. B. R. Co. v. Heddleston, 3 So. Rep. [Ala.] 53; Bouth $ N, A. R. Go, v, Huffman, 76 Ala, 496; Louisville? N. A. & C. R. Go. v. Wolfe, 27 N. E. Rep. [Ind.] 606; English v. Delaware & Hudson Ganal Co., 66 N. Y. 454; Chicago, S. L. & P. R. 'Go. v. Iloldridge, 118 Ind. 281; St. Louis, A. & T. R. Co. v. Mackie, 9 S. W. Rep. [Tex.] 451; Shepard v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ii. Co., 41 N. W. Rep. [Ia.] 564;…
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, C. J.
For each of the plaintiffs in error an action was instituted to recover the damages alleged to have been caused *567by tlieir wrongful, unlawful, and forcible ejection, before arrival at tlieir destination, from a train of the company, on which, they were passengers. The causes of action originated in the same occurrences and the causes were consolidated and but one trial had. There were verdicts and judgments for the plaintiffs, which on error to this court in behalf of the company were reversed and the causes remanded. A second trial in the district court resulted in verdicts and judgments for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ellsworth v. City of FairburyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. SpirkNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Stanwood v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by4 opinions
- Law v. CollinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. KerrNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- Stewart v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1926
- O'Reilly v. HooverNebraska Supreme Court · 1908