Legal Opinion

Duty v. General Finance Company

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1954No. A-4645PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hickman

The controlling question in this case is the right of borrowers to recover damages for mental anguish and physical injuries wilfully and wantonly inflicted on them by wrongful devices practiced by lenders for the purpose of collecting claimed balances due them on notes given by the borrowers. Another injury alleged was the loss of employment by Mrs. Duty. Without detailing the proceedings below, it is sufficient for the purpose of this opinion to state that the trial court held that petitioners’ petition stated no cause of action for damages, and that he case was affirmed by he Court of Civil…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harned v. E-Z Finance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. GTE Southwest, Inc. v. BruceTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Boyle v. WenkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Alsteen v. GehlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Jarchow v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. George v. Jordan Marsh CompanyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API