Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Matlock
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided August 26, 1969No. 7950PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Justice.
Plaintiffs-appellees, William A. Matlock, and wife, Ivory Matlock, sued Defendant-appellant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, under the “Uninsured Automobile Coverage”, as provided in an “Automobile Collision and Public Liability” insurance policy, for damages to their car and for personal injuries that ap-pellees received as the result of an accident they had on or about the 14th day of October, 1967. The other automobile that was involved did not carry any insurance.
The case was tried before the court without a jury. Judgment was entered for the appellees. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hill v. Seaboard Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
- Boughton v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Aguilera v. Reynolds Well Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Wright v. Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- New York Fire Ins. Co. v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Indiana Insurance v. Noble Ex Rel. JordanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
- Sikes v. ZuloagaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Vernon Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Matney Ex Rel. MatneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- American States Insurance Company v. WilliamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Davis v. RobertsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.