Legal Opinion

In re Estate of F.C.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 19, 1995No. 94-618PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andree Layton Roaf, Justice.

This is a paternity case. Appellant R.P. filed a petition for appointment of administrator and a petition for paternity in the matter of the Estate of F.C., deceased. The probate judge found that a paternity action may not be pursued against a deceased father or his estate, and dismissed the petition. The sole issue presented on appeal is whether the death of the putative father precludes an action for the determination of paternity. We hold the probate court did not have subject matter jurisdiction, and affirm the dismissal on this basis.

FACTS

F.C. died on May 14,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. DentonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. Viswanathan v. Mississippi County Community College Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Balentine v. SparkmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Bell v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Durham v. Arkansas Department of Human Services/Child Support Enforcement UnitSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Burns v. Estate of ColeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Durham v. AR. DEPT. OF HUMAN SERV./CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT UNITSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API