Legal Opinion

Kenoyer v. Cardinale (In re Kenoyer)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California

Decided March 20, 2013No. Bankruptcy No. 11-53472-ASW; Adversary No. 11-05130PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ARTHUR S. WEISSBRODT, Bankruptcy Judge.

Defendants Noreen Cardinale, Martha Caron, and Margaret Bush (collectively referred to as “Defendants”) have moved for summary judgment, or in the alternative summary adjudication, on Plaintiff Deraid Kenoyer’s claims against Defendants relating to Defendants’ alleged violation of the automatic stay. Attorney Stephen Finestone represents Defendants, and attorneys Kathryn Diemer and Judith Whitman1 represent Mr. Kenoyer. Mr. *106Kenoyer filed a late Opposition, which Mr. Kenoyer wrote himself. After a…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. A.H. Robins Co. v. PiccininCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Totten v. Kellogg Brown & Root, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
  2. In re: Jordan Gene PearlmanUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2026
  3. Thomas Anthony Frangos et al v. Jonathan Flagg et alUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API