Legal Opinion

Reed v. Continental Insurance

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided December 14, 1906No. Action of Assumpsit No. 201PublishedCited by 10 opinions

upon a policy of fire insurance.

1Opinion of the Court

The facts appear in the charge of the Court:

Lore, C. J.,

charging the jury:

Gentlemen of the jury:—This is an action of assumpsit, *205brought by Mary C. Reed, the plaintiff, against the Continental Insurance Company, the defendant, upon a policy of insurance.

The policy is dated October 10, 1903. It insures the plaintiff against loss or destruction by fire of her household goods- and other personal property "then in the house in which she was living, in St. Georges Hundred in this county, for one year from October 7th, 1903, for an amount not exceeding two thousand dollars. She claims that all this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wallace v. Wilmington & N. R.Superior Court of Delaware · 1889
  2. Harris v. Phœnix InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bacon v. Town of Rocky HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  2. Nathan Miller, Inc. v. Northern InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1944
  3. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. GattaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1913
  4. Rollins Environmental Services, Inc. v. WSMW Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1980
  5. Superior Tube Co. v. Delaware Aircraft Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API