Legal Opinion
Hippert v. Ritchie
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 21, 2012No. A11-152PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*393FINAL ORDER ADOPTING A CONGRESSIONAL REDISTRICTING PLAN
ORDER
On January 21, 2011, plaintiffs Sara Hip-pert et al. (the Hippert plaintiffs) filed this action in Wright County District Court, alleging that the current Minnesota congressional and legislative election districts are unconstitutional under the United States and Minnesota constitutions in light of the 2010 census. The Hippert plaintiffs subsequently petitioned Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea to appoint a special redistricting panel to hear and decide the case. On June 1, 2011, pursuant to her authority under…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Shaw v. RenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Growe v. EmisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Connor v. FinchSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- League of United Latin American Citizens v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Theresa Norelli & a. v. Secretary of State & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2022