Legal Opinion

WERREMEYER, JR. v. SHINEWIDE SHOES, LTD.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 28, 2023No. 3:19-cv-10228Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DAN WERREMEYER, JR., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 19-10228 (GC) (JBD) v. MEMORANDUM OPINION SHINEWIDE SHOES, LTD., Defendant. CASTNER, District Judge This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiff Dan Werremeyer, Jr.’s Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant Shinewide Shoes, Ltd., pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 55(b).1 (ECF No. 74.) Defendant filed no opposition papers. The Court has carefully considered the submissions and decides the motion without oral argument pursuant to Rule 78(b) and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. O'CONNOR v. Sandy Lane Hotel Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  3. Hritz v. Woma Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  4. Mellon Bank (East) Psfs, National Association v. Kenneth v. Farino Leslie Trinin Robert Levitas Eileen MichaelsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  5. Comdyne I, Inc. v. CorbinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API