Perminter v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Blatt,
The petitioner, David Perminter, seeks review of an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) denying benefits. The Board held that his discharge had been for willful misconduct and that he was ineligible for benefits under Section 402 (e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law), Act of December 5,1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §802(e).
The petitioner was employed by Republic Steel Corporation as a stock handler until May 22, 1979, when he was discharged for excessive tardiness. His application for unemployment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Walker v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Kentucky Fried Chicken of Altoona, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Woodson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Woodson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Bracy v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Myers v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Palmer v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Claim of Milbourne v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Kiehl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Krimmel v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.