Legal Opinion
Golo Slipper Co. v. Glass & Fitzgerald Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 14, 1936No. 3996PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREWSTER, District Judge.
In this suit the defendant is charged with infringing design patent No. 87,016, issued May 24, 1932, to plaintiff. The defense is noninfringement.
The patent covers the ornamental design of a complete shoe, or sandal, substantially as shown in the drawings. According to this design, the quarter or rear portion is- composed of a continuous piece of material extending around the quarter in a manner common to the ordinary shoe, and terminating in straps which are laced together at the front of the wearer’s ankle. The forepart, or vamp, of the sandal is a series of straps,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. Whitman Saddle Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Applied Arts Corp. v. Grand Rapids Metalcraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
- Ashley v. Samuel C. Tatum Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
- Whiting Mfg. Co. v. Alvin Silver Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Zidell v. DexterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Parkway Furniture Mfg. Co. v. Dav-O-Niter Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1955
- Gold Crest, LLC v. Project Light, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021
- Gold Crest, LLC v. Project Light, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022