Zidell v. Dexter
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Southern District of California; Oscar A. Trip-pet, Judge. Patent infringement suit by William I. Zidell against Mrs. Billie Dexter, trading as the Billie Bumps Manufacturing Company, and Arthur Letts, trading as the Broadway Department Store. From that portion of the decree holding that certain garments did not infringe (259 Fed. 582), plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The appellant brought suit for infringement of design patent 52,720, issued to the appellant on November 19, 1918, for “children’s rompers.” The court'below held that the patent was valid, and that the defendant Letts had infringed by manufacturing and selling garments of the type described in the proceedings as Exhibit No. 6, but had not infringed in the making and selling of certain other types of garments, known in the record as Exhibits No. 4, No. 5, and No. 8. From that portion of the decree the appellant appeals.
[1] The patent was obtained without specifications…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. Whitman Saddle Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Ashley v. Weeks-Numan Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- Ashley v. Samuel C. Tatum Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
- R. E. Dietz Co. v. Burr & Starkweather Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
3Cited by17 opinions
- Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Eastern America Trio Products, Inc. v. Tang Electronic Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. TalgeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- American Fabrics Co. v. Richmond Lace WorksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Wilson v. Haber Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.