Legal Opinion

BuzzBallz, LLC v. MPL Brands NV, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 18, 2026No. 5:24-cv-04004Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BUZZBALLZ, LLC, Case No. 24-cv-04004-EKL 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING SUMMARY 9 v. JUDGMENT-RELATED DAUBERT MOTIONS 10 MPL BRANDS NV, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 238, 243, 249, 253 Defendant. 11 12 13 Defendant MPL Brands NV, Inc. d/b/a Patco Brands (“Patco”) has moved for summary 14 judgment on the trade dress infringement and unfair competition claims asserted by Plaintiff 15 BuzzBallz, LLC (“BuzzBallz”). This Order addresses a subset of issues raised in the parties’ 16 Daubert motions that are relevant to the summary judgment…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Yeti by Molly Ltd. v. Deckers Outdoor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Clicks Billiards Inc., a Texas Corporation v. Sixshooters Inc., an Arizona Corporation Ronald R. Forbes, a Married Man Jane Doe Forbes, WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Thomas & Betts Corporation and Thomas & Betts Holdings, Inc. v. Panduit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. Kendall-Jackson Winery, Limited v. E. & J. Gallo Winery, a California Corporation, Dba Turning Leaf VineyardsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API