Legal Opinion

People v. Bess

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1984No. Docket Nos. 17166, 17428PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SONENSHINE, J.

In this appeal and consolidated habeas corpus proceeding by Randall Lynn Bess relative to his conviction for armed robbery (Pen. Code, §§ 211, 12022.5), we are asked to resolve three issues. Was it ineffective assistance of counsel to: fail to pursue discovery, bring out Bess’ invocation of Miranda, and fail to interview eyewitnesses to the robbery.

At trial, Bess was represented by retained counsel. Bess was identified as entering the Capistrano National Bank and obtaining cash at gunpoint. Included in the money were marked bills (bait money). A teller described the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. FosselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. People v. FriersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re CorderoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. People v. MayorgaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API