Kelly v. Grainey

The plaintiff, Peter J. Kelly, appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant, Rose Grainey, upon the latter’s cross-complaint in a quiet title action. The pleadings are in the usual form, each party joining issue with the other’s cause of action. It will not be necessary to refer to the other two defendants, whose rights are agreed to be dependent upon those of Rose Grainey.

Briefly stated, the controversy is whether, as asserted by defendant (plaintiff’s sister) and found by the trial court, anoth er sister, Mae J. Kelly, while plaintiff’s employee, informed of all the facts, and living on…