Legal Opinion

Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Tisdale

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 7, 1917No. 1234. [fn*]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Gray County; W. R. Ewing, Judge. Action by Martha A. Tisdale and others against the Panhandle & Santa Fé Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Appellees Martha A. Tisdale and May Belle Tisdale, for themselves and for C. B. Tisdale, Ira Tisdale, Will C. Tisdale, Hal Tisdale, and Edward H. Tisdale, instituted this suit against appellant to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by appellees on account of the death of C. R. Tisdale, the husband of Martha A. Tisdale and the father of the other plaintiffs. Plaintiffs alleged, in substance, that the defendant's line of railway at Pampa, Tex., crossed the main street of that town, and that on the 15th day of June, 1915, C. R. Tisdale was lawfully traveling along said street in a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Love v. Detroit, Jackson & Chicago RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Hovey v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Sterling v. Union Carbide Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Wichita Valley Ry. Co. v. SomervilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Williams Land Co. v. CrullCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tisdale v. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  2. Houston Press Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. ZumwaltCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API