Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Thurman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 24, 1994No. A94A0018PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Lee Wilson (plaintiff) asserted claims against Jim Thurman, John Lodge, Hobart Hind and the City of Albany (defendants) for malicious prosecution and invasion of privacy, alleging defendants wrongfully prosecuted him for sodomy in 1986. Specifically, plaintiff alleged that defendants Thurman and Lodge, while acting in their capacities as law enforcement officers for the City of Albany, were informed by the subject of a criminal investigation (“the suspect”) that plaintiff sodomized the suspect on July 14, 1982; that defendants Thurman and Lodge had information…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Darnell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  3. Waters v. FleetwoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  4. Meyer v. LedfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  5. Cox Communications, Inc. v. LoweCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kelly v. SernaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Tapley v. CollinsDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1999
  3. Nix v. Cox Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API