Legal Opinion

Caruthers v. Niblack

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 17, 1898Published

Judgment by Confession. Error to the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. TheodoreBrentano, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sears

At the April term, 1894, of the Superior Court, a judgment was entered against plaintiff in error by confession, upon a promissory note, with warrant of attorney, made by her and one James P. Caruthers. At' the June term, 1897, of the court a motion was made by plaintiff in error to vacate the judgment, and for leave to plead. Affidavits were filed in support of the motion. The motion was overruled. To review the order overruling the motion, this writ of error is brought.

Assignments of error numbered 1, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13, all go to the entering of the judgment, are not well assigned,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hall v. HamiltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Adam v. ArnoldIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Hall v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Frear v. Commercial National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Board of Trustees of Town 13 South, Range 3 West v. MisenheimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1878

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API