Legal Opinion

Ludowici Roofing Tile Co. v. Pennsylvania Inst. for Instruction of the Blind

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided July 16, 1902No. 4PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity.

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBAED, District Judge.*

It is conceded that there is in the hands of the defendant the Pennsylvania Institution for the Instruction of the Blind the sum of $37,278.11, due to the firm of J. W. Mercur & Co., the parties who had the contract for the construction of the buildings of the institute at Overbrook, Pa., and that all those who have any claim upon the fund are now before the court. The question, therefore, simply is, to whom does it, in whole or in part, belong? The amount so admitted to be due is not all .that is claimed on behalf of the contractors, but how much, if anything, is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Peugh v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Amsinck v. BeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. East Lewisburg Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  4. Getty v. Pennsylvania Institution for the Instruction of the BlindSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  5. Crawford County v. Merchants' Nat. BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ludowici Roofing Tile Co. v. Pennsylvania Inst. for Instruction of the BlindCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API