Legal Opinion

Elum v. Kling

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 19, 1957No. 4486PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLIS, Judge.

This suit was originally a proceeding to-enjoin the defendant from blocking a public road. It was before us when the defendant appealed from a judgment rendered by the District Court on the merits, the cause *701being before the lower court at that time for a hearing on a rule nisi to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue. We remanded the cause, Elum v. Kling, La.App., 90 So.2d 881, for the reasons and authorities therein expressed.

Exceptions were overruled, answer filed and a trial had upon the merits, when it was stipulated the testimony taken on the rule nisi…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bomar v. City of Baton RougeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. Goree v. Midstates Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  3. Bourree v. A. K. Roy, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  4. Porter v. HuckabaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  5. Bell v. TycerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Curtis v. GoebelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Latour v. DupuisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Town of Eunice v. ChildsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Braxton v. GuilloryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Le Boeuf v. RouxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API