Legal Opinion

Buholtz v. United States Marshals Service

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 16, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-0943PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Amit P. Mehta, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Kenneth Buholtz, proceeding pro se, brings this action under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) against the United States Marshals Service (“USMS” or “Defendant”), 1 seeking medical, phone, and disciplinary records created during his incarceration at a USMS contract facility in Fannin County, Texas. 5 U.S.C. § 552. Defendant now moves for summary judgment, asserting that the documents Plaintiff seeks are not in its possession.

Based on the parties’ submissions and the record evidence, the court grants…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Safecard Services, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  2. Military Audit Project, Felice D. Cohen, Morton H. Halperin v. William Casey, Director of Central IntelligenceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  3. Kissinger v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States Department of Justice v. Tax AnalystsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Defenders of Wildlife v. United States Border PatrolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aunhkhotep v. JordanDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2024
  2. Casillas-Prieto v. United States Marshal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
  3. Informed Consent Action Network v. National Aeronautics & Space AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
  4. Maryland Attorney General Opinion 110OAG60, Maryland Attorney General Reports2025
  5. Monikang v. Federal Communications CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API