Legal Opinion
Kingwood Oil Co. v. Bell
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 29, 1953No. 10693PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant (hereinafter called Kingwood) brought this action against certain defendants who are legatees, grantees, and assignees of William Bell, deceased. These defendants joined in a motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The Texas Company was also named as a defendant, but did not join in the motion to dismiss, and filed an answer. The original complaint was dismissed and thereafter plaintiff filed its amended complaint, naming the same said defendants and seeking a declaratory…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carroll v. Morrison Hotel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
- Publicity Building Realty Corporation v. HanneganCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Peterson Steels, Inc. v. SeidmonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- Chicago & N. W. R. Co. v. Chicago Packaged Fuel Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- Burley v. Elgin, J. & E. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Subin v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Eugene M. Fuhrer v. Malcolm W. FuhrerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
- Sol A. Dann, John H. Neville and Louise A. Turek v. Studebaker-Packard Corporation, Harold E. Churchill, Hugh J. Ferry, and A. J. PortaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
- Lada v. WilkieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
- United States v. DugganCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.