Interstate Transit Co. v. Derr
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Galen
This is an action in injunction. The cause came on for bearing upon an order to show cause why tbe defendants should not be enjoined from interfering with and preventing tbe plaintiff from operating for hire a line of motor-busses between tbe city of Wallace, in tbe state of Idaho, and tbe city of Kalispell, in tbe state of Montana. It was submitted upon tbe admitted facts contained in tbe pleadings, and no testimony was introduced.
It appears from tbe allegations of. tbe complaint admitted by tbe answer that the plaintiff, a Montana corporation, since the first day of June, 1924, has been tbe…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Kane v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- West Suburban Transportation Co. v. Chicago & West Towns Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. CaplanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
- State v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1926
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. BennettMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- Stoner v. UndersethMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- Willis v. BuckMontana Supreme Court · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.