Grant v. Jack
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Action of trespass quare clausum. Defendant filed plea of general issue. Verdict was rendered for defendant. Plaintiff filed exceptions to certain rulings of the Justice presiding relative to the admissibility of certain evidence.
1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.
In support of this action of trespass quare clausum the plaintiff undertook to prove that the defendant was one of a number of men who unlawfully entered upon his premises in Bowdoinham in the evening of .February 22,1915, and presented to him a threatening letter. The verdict was for the defendant, and the case comes up on exceptions.
The plaintiff introduced evidence tending to show that on the evening of February 22 the defendant brought the letter, written on a typewriter, to a number of men assembled in the rooms of the Pythian *344building in Bowdoinham where it was partly read by him and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. . StorrsNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- State v. FreshwaterUtah Supreme Court · 1906
- Huber Manufacturing Co. v. ClaudelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. SwankOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Schertzinger v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961