Legal Opinion
Thorman v. American Seafoods Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 1, 2005No. 03-36012Published
1Opinion of the Court
421 F.3d 1090
Philip THORMAN, and the class of similarly situated persons who worked aboard the factory trawlers managed by the in personam defendants, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
AMERICAN SEAFOODS COMPANY; American Seafoods Company LLC, In Personam; Ocean Rover F/T; American Triumph F/T; Northern Eagle F/T; Northern Hawk F/T; Northern Jaeger F/T; American Dynasty F/T; American Express F/T; Victoria Ann F/V; Christina Ann F/T; Katie Ann F/T; Pacific Scout F/V, and other vessels managed by the in personam defendants, their engines, tackle, equipment, appurtenances, freights, and cargo, In Rem,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Oscar W. Jones v. Lou Blanas County of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- William Earl Warren III v. City of Carlsbad Brian Watson James Thompson Frank Mannen Raymond Patchett Stewart Gary Ann JansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Chandris, Inc. v. LatsisSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.