Legal Opinion
Hornsby v. Lufthansa German Airlines
District Court, C.D. California
Decided January 6, 2009No. CV 07-7594 ABC (Ex)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
AUDREY B. COLLINS, Chief Judge.
Pending before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (“Motion”), filed on October 10, 2008, by Defendant Lufthansa German Airlines (“Lufthansa” or “Defendant”). Plaintiff Glenda M. Hornsby (“Hornsby” or “Plaintiff’) filed an Opposition on October 16, 2008, and Defendant filed a Reply on November 10, 2008. On November 14, 2008, the Court determined that the matter was appropriate for submission without oral argument, and took the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Solomon Lew v. Stanton Moss and Harlean MossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- El Al Israel Airlines, Ltd. v. Tsui Yuan TsengSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Roberts v. CorrothersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fadhliah v. Société Air FranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
- In Re Air Crash Over the Mid-Atlantic on June 1, 2009District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Erwin-Simpson v. AirAsia BerhadCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Erwin-Simpson v. Air Asia BerhardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019