Legal Opinion

Gammill v. Culverhouse

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1927No. 6 Div. 875PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

Since our decision in the case of Citizens’, etc., Co. v. Lee, 182 Ala. 561 (30), 581, 62 So. 199, the rule has been firmly settled in this state that the plaintiff is entitled, - upon his seasonable and proper motion, to have the jurors from whom the trial jury is to be selected qualified as to their relation to, or interest in, any insurance company which would be liable, in whole or in part, for any judgment that might be rendered against the defendant. Beatty v. Palmer, 196 Ala. 67, 71 So. 422; United States, etc., Co. v. Warner, 198 Ala. 595, 73 So. 936.

The denial of plaintiff’s motion…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Citizen's L. H. & P. Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Beatty v. PalmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. United States C. I. P. & F. Co. v. WarnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. McCaleb v. ReedSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Vredenburgh Saw Mill Co. v. BlackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Fortson v. HesterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  5. International Harvester Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API