Legal Opinion

Shults v. Krauskopf

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 16, 1926No. 7016PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLENDON, C. j.

This suit was brought by defendants in error, Oscar Krauskopf and Wm. Bierschwale, as pártners under the firm name of Citizens’ Bank, Unincorporated, of Fredericksburg, Gillespie County, Tex., against C. E. Shults, Walter Yander Stucken, A. R. Latham, and Wes Smith, upon a negotiable promissory note alleged to have been executed by the four named defendants and made payable to the Citizens’ Bank of Fred-ericksburg. Shults and Vander Stucken made default, and judgment was rendered against them accordingly. Latham and Smith, who are plaintiffs in error here, filed a plea in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Paragon Oil Syndicate v. Rhoades Drilling Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Gregory v. NewsomCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Chapman v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cooper Cotton Co. v. First State Bank of O'DonnellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Snelling v. Security Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Whitney v. FuchsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Kollmann v. MyattCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API