Legal Opinion

Brookhouse v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 5, 1986No. 85-0443PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P.J.

The major issue is whether the strict time limitations of sec. 805.16, Stats., regarding motions after verdict, may be relaxed by sec. 801.15(2)(a), Stats., permitting enlargement of specified time periods upon a showing of excusable neglect. We sustain the trial court's holding that sec. 801.15(2)(a) may not be so used. The trial court therefore correctly ruled that it lost competency to exercise jurisdiction because the motions were not filed within twenty days after verdict.

Eugene J. Brookhouse, guardian ad litem for Dawn D. Spencer, is plaintiff-appellant. State Farm Insurance Company and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. WyssWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. WollmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. City of Wauwatosa v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Jos. P. Jansen Co. v. Milwaukee Area District Board of Vocational, Technical & Adult EducationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  2. Hartford Insurance v. WalesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Brandner v. Allstate InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Andersen v. Village of Little ChuteCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  5. General Telephone Co. of Wisconsin v. Auto-Owners InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API