Spencer v. Haines
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On'application for a. venire de novo.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Reed, J.
This motion is made on the coming in of the postea, and the insistence by the counsel for the plaintiff is that the verdict is so imperfect that no judgment can be entered upon it.
From the postea it appears that the action was brought to recover damages arising from an injury to one Lizzie Spencer, a married woman, which injury was caused by a machine in the laundry of the defendant. The counsel for the plaint*326iff, talcing advantage of the provisions of section 21 of the Practice act (Pamph. L. 1903, p. 540), added to the claim of the wife in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bouvier v. Baltimore & New York RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
3Cited by4 opinions
- Poland v. ParsekianNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Haines v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909
- Navarro v. MartinUnited States District Court · 1944
- O'Carroll v. StarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914