Armstrong, Crislip, Day & Co. v. Painter
West Virginia Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit Court, Taylor County. • Suit by Armstrong, Crislip, Day & Co. against William J. Painter and others. Prom decree for defendants, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
POEFENBARGER, JUDGE
The purpose of this appeal is relief from a decree requiring the appellant to repay to the appellees, a portion of the money previously decreed to him in a lien creditor’s suit. After the *395liens liad been ascertained by a commissioner and fixed by the court and the real estate sold, the debtors, claiming a credit of $200.00 on one of the debts, the amount of a certain check, •and interest thereon, came in, after notice, and moved the court to reverse the decree, in so far as it declared that certain debt to be a first lien on a certain tract of land, and the court, deeming…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Thomson v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Munoz v. . WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Ohio Central R. Co. v. Central Trust Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Ward v. Ward's HeirsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
- Chapman v. Pittsburgh & Steubenville RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- First National Bank of Webster Springs v. McGrawWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
- Blumberg Bros. v. KingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
- Morgan v. Farmington Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
- Todd v. WebbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Dixon v. Hesper Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.