Patrick Francis Heiter v. Lindalyn Heiter
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
RANDOLPH, Presiding Justice,
for the Court: -
¶1. Patrick Heiter sought to terminate or reduce his alimony obligation. He claims error in the chancellor’s finding that he had failed to prove a material change in circumstances since his divorce from‘Lin-dalyn Heiter that would justify termination or modification of- alimony. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the chancellor.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND
¶ 2. The following procedural history and facts are taken from the chancellor’s Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law.
The parties divorced ... on August 22, 2001. As part…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brooks v. BrooksMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
- Powell v. CampbellMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
- Ellis v. EllisMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
- Rubisoff v. RubisoffMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
- Gillespie v. GillespieMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kimberly Wolfe Smith v. Milton MartinMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
- April Quen Garner v. Judi L. GarnerMississippi Supreme Court · 2019
- Bruenderman v. BruendermanCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017
- Leslie B. Shumake, Jr. v. Katarina Sitton ShumakeMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
- Michael T. Gerty v. Joesie R. GertyMississippi Supreme Court · 2020