Legal Opinion

Doe v. Allen

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 11, 1905No. 49PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. Thomas F. Graham, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

This is an appeal by "defendant from a judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial.

The complaint sets forth two causes of action, the first count alleging that defendant became indebted to plaintiff •on the nineteenth day of December, 1899, in the sum of $747.95 for freight money upon a cargo of coal that day •delivered by plaintiff to defendant at his (defendant’s) ¡special instance and request, which said defendant promised to pay in consideration of the delivery by plaintiff to defendant of said cargo of coal.

The only points presented by the appeal concern the first •cause of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Raymond v. GloverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. City of Stockton v. DunhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. DornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  2. Fuller v. TowneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Wurdeman v. WallerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Hammond Lumber Co. v. CravensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API