In re the Marriage of Young
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
Mother appeals, assigning error to, inter alia, the trial court’s entry of a judgment for attorney fees as a remedial sanction in a contempt proceeding. Mother contends that the court erred in awarding fees without allowing her the 14 days permitted by ORCP 68 to respond to father’s statement of attorney fees. We reverse the judgment for attorney fees and remand for proceedings in accordance with ORCP 68 C(4)(b), but otherwise affirm.
We note, at the outset, that mother challenges both the award of attorney fees and the underlying determination of contempt. However, none of mother’s present…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re the Marriage of O'NealCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- In re the Marriage of WhitlowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chase v. VernamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- In re the Marriage of TibbettsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Matter of Marriage of ProctorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Proctor v. MavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- In Re the Marriage of OrnelasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.