Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of O'Neal

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 17, 1999No. 96DO-0049-AB; CA A96400PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.

Wife appeals from a dissolution of marriage judgment, assigning error to the amount and duration of the spousal support award, to the trial court’s failure to award her any of the increase in value of husband’s assets that occurred during the marriage, and to both the amount of the attorney fees and the court’s failure to follow the procedure of ORCP 68 in setting that amount. On de novo review, we affirm the court’s award of spousal support and its property division. We write only to address the attorney fee issue.

Wife argues that the trial court erred in failing to follow the procedure of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of HaguewoodOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State Ex Rel. Roberts v. Bomareto Ent., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Pointe West Apts v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. In re the Marriage of TibbettsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. In re the Marriage of SaundersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. In re the Marriage of TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. Jaffe v. Principle Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API