Legal Opinion

Kormos v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 7, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McCLOSKEY, Senior Judge.

George W. Kormos (Claimant) petitions for review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board), affirming the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ), denying Claimant’s claim petition. We now reverse and remand.

Van Air Systems, Inc. (Employer) employed Claimant as a fitter/welder/assembler for approximately twenty-three years. Claimant’s job duties required him to work inside iron vessels, grinding, arc welding, hammering and making any other necessary repairs. In the course and scope of his employment on May 1, 1987, as he was exiting one…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Boeing Helicopter Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Bellefonte Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Hill v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Socha v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Scranton v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API