Legal Opinion
State v. . Jordan
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided December 12, 1934PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchencic, J.
Tbe charge in tbe bill upon which tbe defendant was tried and convicted was that of feloniously receiving stolen goods, knowing them to have been stolen.
Upon cross-examination tbe defendant testified as follows:
“I am not a liquor seller; I don’t say I sold liquor. I drink liquor. I have not sold liquor around up> there. I don’t know that I have sold any — just gone out and sold it. I have not sold it anywhere. If I said to tbe officers that I sold liquor to everyone in my county except tbe preacher, and gave him half a gallon, I was out of my bead. I said if they could get anyone to say a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. . PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1842
- State v. . EflerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- In Re Will of CravenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- State v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. CutshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. . McKinnonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.